If you don't agree with the above statement, you are simply not paying attention.
I am going to the Hammer Forum presentation tomorrow (Thursday, 7:30 PM, UCLA Hammer Forum, Westwood, Free) http://hammer.ucla.edu/…/tackling-climate-change-nationall…/ hosted by Ian Masters. There will be discussion of what it will take for our civilization to deal with what now looks like its greatest challenge ever, even surpassing, albeit more slowly evolving, the wars of the 20th Century.
I am intrigued by Stanford Prof. Mark Jacobson's analysis that says
that if we did what the USA used to be able to do (examples: the
Manhattan Project, the Apollo Program), that is launch a major publicly
funded infrastructure project, we could in fact switch to 100% renewable
energy for transportation, electric power, and manufacturing, by as
early as 2030. But we would have to start RIGHT NOW, and there's no sign
there is any political will at all to do this.
I will say this calmly, but in fact our hair should be on fire: If we don't wake up soon, our economy will collapse, tens of millions (mostly, unjustly, but nonetheless, in the third world), will die, and the very existence of our technological civilization may not survive this century.
See this for some idea of what we must then do:
http://www.azimuthproject.org/…/A+path+to+sustainable+energy
I will say this calmly, but in fact our hair should be on fire: If we don't wake up soon, our economy will collapse, tens of millions (mostly, unjustly, but nonetheless, in the third world), will die, and the very existence of our technological civilization may not survive this century.
See this for some idea of what we must then do:
http://www.azimuthproject.org/…/A+path+to+sustainable+energy
No comments:
Post a Comment
Gyromantic Informicon. Comments are not moderated. If you encounter a problem, please go to home page and follow directions to send me an e-mail.