Happy New Year

Joe Manchin and a Center Left/Progressive Majority

I keep reading about "left rage" at Joe Manchin. Which I admit I felt... and strongly... in the immediate aftermath of what I thought of as the "big betrayal" on BBB. I still think he pretty much lied, and deliberately led Democratic negotiators on when he never intended to vote for it. But I'm over it. Wasting time raging against Manchin accomplishes nothing. Democrats need to focus on the bills we can get passed, and, especially, on rebuilding our message, funding and campaign for the upcoming elections. Which by all accounts will be a steep uphill climb, at best. Getting the best reform of voting rights we can manage, even if it means paring it down to key points where we can actually get Republican support, is part of that. 

The fact is, we may have had a nominal Democratic majority after the 2020 elections, but we did not have a Center Left or Progressive majority, and we can't get a Center Left or Progressive agenda passed until we do. This is not even likely right now, but if we don't fight for it, we certainly won't achieve it. 

Edward O. Wilson

Let's note and mourn the death of the great naturalist and articulate advocate of the concept of active preservation of biological diversity, Edward O. Wilson. He died yesterday at 92. \

A brief rant on Democratic Messaging

I suppose I should not substitute my impressions for those of folks who spend their whole lives figuring out how best to present progressive political ideas to the public. But let's face it... it ain't working. Recently I was thinking about FDR and his fireside chats, and, unrelated, I happened to watch on YouTube some old auto commercials from the 50s and early 60s. In one, they had an ensemble of well dressed people on the grounds of Mt. Palomar at night gazing out into the heavens, whereupon meteors fell from the sky and out popped the all new, forward looking Fords for 1960! The well dressed mob then burst into song... I kid you not... about the wonderful exciting new models for the new decade! Whereupon an announcer presented in great detail all the new features and why they were better than the competition. I dunno, but Ford did sell a lot of Falcons that year. 

What does this have to do with convincing voters to vote Democratic in 2022? Quite a lot, I think, What does the average voter hear from President Biden and other Democratic leaders on a daily basis? Pretty much diddly. OK, I get it, the media landscape is completely different. But a whole hell of a lot of people are contributing money all the time, and I have to wonder where are the big production ads on all media touting the things Democrats have done and are still poised to do,,, in detail... and how it benefits you, Facebook viewer, YouTube viewer, TV viewer, radio listener, etc. And, carefully, but definitively, make clear that the problem is that we don't have a majority in the Senate that can pass these things, and that our majority in the House needs to be built up... We need your help to overcome the pandemic, build back better, ensure that when the majority what the majority wants becomes law by focusing on voting rights.... etc. etc. 

This isn't rocket science, but it sure seems to me that our party really, really sucks at this stuff that people have known how to do for a really, really long time. We need an overhaul. And we need to see and hear Biden, Harris, attractive and articulate senators like Sherrod Brown, Elizabeth Warren and Alex Padilla and congresspeople like Katie Porter, Ted Lieu, Pramilla Jaypal, Joe Neguse, David Cicilline, and Sheila Jackson Lee, These folks are all more than capable of articulating the Democratic message in terms everyone can understand. But there needs to be much more of an effort to promote them and our message, everywhere, all the time, and to convey the point that voting for Democrats, on all levels, and especially in states where the margins aren't really that far apart... is the way to break the logjam in Washington and actually accomplish goals. 

Omicron: view persisting that it may be less virulent than previous variants

There's a good deal of back and forth on whether the Omicron variant is or is not less virulent than earlier forms of the SARS Co-V 2 virus. Here's another one reiterating the persistent view among some in the epidemiology community that it seems likely that it is. Less virulent, despite being both much more transmissible and more resistant to the vaccines, at least insofar as initial infection is concerned. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/26/omicron-bleak-new-year-or-beginning-of-the-end-for-the-pandemic 

In any case, it seems completely clear that those who are fully vaccinated stand a much better chance of having only mild illness if they are infected, so the complete lunacy of refusing vaccination is only underscored. For me, it has reached the point where my sympathy for those who become seriously ill despite outright refusal to follow the best medical advice and get vaccinated has worn very thin. Every premature death is a tragedy, but people who contribute to the cause of their own and others' deaths or disability by willful refusal to do the right thing lose any claim to sympathy. Compassion, yes; sympathy, no; they are not quite the same thing. 

Re: JWST successful launch

Don't forget that it was a joint project with Canada's Space Agency, the European Space Agency and NASA. 

As a Canadian-American, I am so proud of Canada's involvement.

On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 8:41 AM David Studhalter (ds@gyromantic.com) <oldionus@gmail.com> wrote:

Congratulations to ESA and Ariane Space for delivering the JWST to space; now the mission depends primarily on the critical engineering of NASA and the various US based agencies responsible for this amazing mission. It will take about a month before the telescope's "first light." Wishing well for a project that's taken many years and a hell of lot of exacting and detailed work to get us to this point. And by "us" I mean the whole world. 

JWST successful launch

Congratulations to ESA and Ariane Space for delivering the JWST to space; now the mission depends primarily on the critical engineering of NASA and the various US based agencies responsible for this amazing mission. It will take about a month before the telescope's "first light." Wishing well for a project that's taken many years and a hell of lot of exacting and detailed work to get us to this point. And by "us" I mean the whole world. 

Webb Space Telescope

Here is my hope for the completely successful launch of the Webb Space Telescope, now scheduled for tomorrow, Christmas Day. 

Article on Climate Change Policy

I reluctantly agree with this article's author. We simply have to pass something on Climate Change. 

https://link.defenseone.com/click/61c5fa743985a2740ace3fd2/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZGVmZW5zZW9uZS5jb20vaWRlYXMvMjAyMS8xMi93ZXJlLWhlYWRpbmctdG93YXJkLXZlcnktYW1lcmljYW4tY2xpbWF0ZS10cmFnZWR5LzM2MDEwMw/61c4a8e4c220891fe169d4c4B3486248b 

Christmas Oratorio on YouTube

Wonderful authentic performance of the Weihnachtsoratorium of J. S. Bach from the Bach Foundation in Trogen, Switzerland. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4Anu6qvhrM 

New Vaccine Development ... from Defense research (!)

Farflung correspondents: 

There have been quite a few unsourced rumors about an "all Coronavirus" or "all SARS" vaccine in development, but here's some fairly concrete news, and, for a change, it's at least somewhat encouraging, albeit preliminary. 

 https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2021/12/us-army-creates-single-vaccine-effective-against-all-covid-sars-variants/360089/

grinchy note in counterpoint with my more hopeful previous note

Y'all know the song It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas? Well, this year I'm thinking I'll write a new song, It sure ain't lookin' nuttin' like Christmas. I think we're all sick to tears of pandemics, crazy people running a political party... oh, you name it. Happy Holidays, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, nonetheless. 

Omicron news

I'm sure I'll be accused of grasping at straws, but I follow Josh Marshall's summaries of his wide sampling of literature on COVID developments. While he notes that the spread of Omicron is really, really fast; much faster than all previous variants (so we can expect it to be everywhere in the next two to three weeks)... note this: 

The more reassuring news is that we now have a growing body of evidence that this wave produces significantly less mortality and hospitalization as a percentage of cases than previous waves. Whether that is because this variant is intrinsically less lethal or because it's spreading so rapidly through a population where the overwhelming majority of people have some level of immunity is not clear. But the precise mechanism seems secondary to the observed fact. It's also true that at least in South Africa the outbreak in Gauteng province peaked after roughly four weeks – about half as long as previous outbreaks. These are both encouraging signs.

The usual view seems to be that this thing is so contagious, and so able to break through and cause at least some infection even in vaccinated people, that everyone should just expect to get COVID in the next few months. Not everyone will, and for the great majority if they do it will be mild and not require hospitalization or be a real threat to life, but this is spreading so fast and spiking infection rates so high that unless you go into lockdown, which most people are just too weary to do again, getting sick is fairly likely. Fortunately, the real threat of this pandemic has been greatly mitigated by the vaccines, and that remains true. 

Of course the corollary of that, for people with friends or relatives who are not vaccinated, is that for them, there's a world of hurt still to come. 

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/twilight-of-delta

In the bleak midwinter

Farflung correspondents, 

So today is the actual solstice, the winter of our discontent, the bleakest and shortest day of the year. Here's to everyone having wonderful holiday coming up and for much better 2022. The late John McCain used to like to say it's always darkest before it's pitch black (I never quote him for anything else, but that's a pretty good line).... but I am hopeful that some things in our political, environmental and public health worlds that seem pretty dire right now may turn out not to be quite as bad as we think right now. 

Take care everyone. 

2 thoughts on BBB/Manchin

Not exactly profound, but if you have any doubt that Manchin is not really a Democrat, consider the fact that he didn't even call Biden or Schumer, and he made his death announcement on F*ing Fox News. We never did have a genuine majority in the Senate, and we should proceed on that basis. I rest my case. 

Second point. Can't help but wonder. Is there something, anything that might induce Lisa Murkowski to change parties, or at least change her vote? She is literally the only Republican I can think of who might conceivably do that. Collins, I'm pretty sure, is far too bought and paid for. And, literally, Portman? nah... Romney?... good luck with that.... there are no others. 

Manchin the program killer

Let me just say this. Now that it's clear that Joe Manchin has torpedoed the Democratic agenda, let's face facts. Manchin is a f*king liar. He strung other Democrats including the president along for months and months, got everything he said he wanted, then said, F*k you, the answer is no anyway. I suspect there's no point in attempting to negotiate with him further. The sad truth is that we Democrats only thought we ever had a Democratic majority in the Senate. Manchin is not and never was a Democrat. He's a mole, taking orders from McConnell. Our system of disproportionate representation in the Senate is now being shown up for what it is: a fatal flaw in our system that makes long term minoritarian rule not only possible but inevitable. 

Nonetheless, although the way forward looks pretty bleak, I think it's time to start delivering the message that Democrats have great ideas and can put them in effect, but only if voters give us majorities. We cannot pass legislation in the face of unified opposition from the Insurrectionist party and no majority in the Senate. Sadly. 

cars

When I was a kid and "into cars" (like all boys were supposed to be), I thought this 

1964 Plymouth Valiant

... was a big improvement on this 

1962 Valiant (not Plymouth, just Valiant)

... designed by the legendary Virgil Exner. I thought the boxy 64 model, which was also the basis of the Barracuda, was "sleeker" and "more modern." Tastes change. I now see the original Valiant as what the Studebaker Lark was supposed to be, and a real classy design. They're rare now. When I was in high school, you could buy one with its legendary half-million mile slant six engine, for about $450. Now, if it's got a decent body and not too torn up, they're about $11,000, more than five times what they cost new. 

Holy shit.

But I'm glad someone's thinking about the unthinkable in the military. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/12/17/eaton-taguba-anderson-generals-military/ 

Some musings on possible long term futures etc.

I wrote this to a polymath friend of mine who's mostly interested in history, law and politics (and to a lesser extent, religion), but is also a gamer, a Tolkien fan, and a reader of science fiction. (Which, mostly, I no longer read because I find it too arbitrarily fantastical, for the same reason I rarely enjoy fantasy). It was part of a far ranging dialog that is still ongoing. Anyway, some of my farflung correspondents will find this familiar (overly familiar perhaps) territory from me, others just won't be interested, and to those readers, I recommend the delete button. Not everyone is interested in everything. 

§§

Talking of science fiction, vs. potential real futures, may I make one or two possibly obvious points that sci fi almost always ignores? If you have reason to disagree with any of this, I'd be interested in why. 

I.    The speed of light is pretty slow from the point of view of creatures wanting to create interstellar civilizations, or even just seed life to other stars' systems. And this will never change. We must adapt to the necessity of very long travel times between stars, which will limit our capability to grow, but not prevent interstellar colonization and development. It will prevent the development of a "galactic village," because there is no way around the fact that it takes 100,000 years to send so much as a telegram from one edge of the galaxy to the other. (Communication takes almost as long as transportation, with c the limit). We will never be a cohesive galactic empire. But we may, nonetheless, fill up our whole galaxy and even beyond with advanced life from Earth, assuming (as I tend to) that we don't find competitors nearby. 

Forget about the Alcubierre warp drive or any other means of FTL. They all take either infinite energy or necessitate the conversion of matter and information into the deeply scrambled quantum goo that is what happens to ordinary matter and energy near singularities. FTL is impossible because it violates causation and the speed of light is an essential characteristic of all matter and energy. There is no way around it and never will be. If you think "science delves into the unknown and perhaps they'll solve this someday," I have two reasons why this is not the case. Science does delve into the unknown. It isn't really concerned with accumulating "truth," and anywhere near its frontiers it doesn't do that too well, which is why new theories are almost always wrong, at least in some details, and people get the impression that science is just another religion. It's not. It's a method. And it does build up a body of "knowns." Newton wasn't wrong. F does equal ma in the realm of physics we actually live in. Einstein expanded on that, but in context, Newton is still true. Thing about the speed of light is that it's everywhere. It's in all the relativity equations, all the quantum equations. The universe as we see it stretching out to the visible horizon (and it continues far beyond) could not exist if it were possible for ordinary matter with mass to translate at speeds faster than c.

The second reason is Fermi.* This is purely observational. We look out and we're looking back in time. So 5 billion light years out we're looking at a universe only a bit more than half as old as the one we're living in. Beyond that are more and more galaxies, but we don't see much detail. What we don't see anywhere is evidence of super advanced technological civilizations. Do they exist? Who knows. Maybe. But, even 5 billion years ago, if a civilization figured out how to make starships that could travel FTL, they would've had all that time to colonize all the galaxies between here and there, but the light from their galaxy would only now be reaching us. So we only know about the rough present relatively nearby. EXCEPT, we can be pretty damn sure that no one, anywhere near here, has figured out how to travel FTL, because if they had, I'm pretty sure they would be here now. And they aren't. Spiral galaxies are all much the same, and there's a whole hell of a lot of them. If even one in a million spawns a tech civilization, and such civilizations behave as you'd expect, exploring exponentially (OK, that's not a given but seems pretty likely given how all life seems to behave), there would be an enormous number of inhabited galaxies, from a small number of discrete origins of life. There may well be tech civilizations, but they don't expand or travel FTL. And since conditions in galaxies have been much as they are now for at least half the time the universe has existed, many of them would likely be immensely old. I would not be surprised if we eventually find evidence of very ancient galactic civilizations out there, even without FTL, because, as noted, interstellar colonization and even galactic colonization is still possible; it's just a lot slower. So we will not be visited by them or they by us, ever. (Eventually the accelerating expansion of the universe will cause even relatively nearby galaxies to be invisible to each other anyway, but that's a long time in the future). 

 The same rationale means that it's highly unlikely that a spacefaring civilization already exists in the Milky Way. Because we (humans and our successors) will likely visit every single star system (at least with robot probes) within just a few million years at most, if we succeed. And I'm pretty sure if that had ever happened before, we would know about it and our reality would be completely different. If this isn't clear, think about this. Let's say we develop a tech solar system civilization and begin building starships, with the grand plan to replicate the process, star by star, until we've visited and/or colonized all 200+ billion systems in the Milky Way. How long would that take? I won't even try to do the math (others have), but even if it's just one begets two, or even 1.1, and each one takes 1,000 years, the entire galaxy could be Earthized in less than 20 million years. Probably a lot less. That's how long hominids have already existed on Earth. If we did it in two million years (possible, but would require a bit more energetic development), that's only as long as the genus Homo has already existed. And it's a teeny fraction of the length of time that the galaxy has been more or less like it is now, with stars and planets, some of them potential abodes of life and all of them potential sites for technological life. We will likely do this if we don't die first. So the conclusion that in all that time no one has come along with this same capability (at least in this galaxy) seems pretty inescapable. If another civilization were out there in this galaxy now at roughly our same level, it would be a coincidence akin to winning the Irish Sweepstakes three times in a row. 

II. Energy will cease to be the issue, in terms of habitability. You've probably heard about Dyson swarms and ringworlds and all that, which is interesting and probably quite real as a potential. We can construct huge structures and live in them. (BTW, you didn't take large scale rotation as a substitute for gravity into account; it will almost certainly be used to make large structures habitable). If you want a big technological community, better to keep everyone close. The problem won't be getting enough energy, because we will figure out fusion and the star already leaks out huge amounts we can harness. Possibly dark matter or other unknown physics will yield new sources of energy, but even if they don't, this is all possible. A harder problem is waste heat. It will literally be hugely difficult to keep habitats with trillions of beings (even cyber beings) from getting too hot to function. But that's soluble, too. We will build systems to keep the inner system cool by transporting and radiating waste heat, although this actually is a hard limit to growth. (We should look harder for infrared "stars"... they could be civilizations). But space migration is its own imperative. I can't give you a reason why an advanced civilization would want to spread its version of life and explore the galaxy and even beyond, except that it's what we do. It's who we are. It is possible, and if we don't die, we'll do it. (We, including our successors who may not resemble us that closely). 

☻§

*Reference is to the Fermi Paradox. In 1950 the eminent Italian American physicist Enrico Fermi interjected in a conversation with colleagues about the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence, something like If they exist, where are they? Which is a much more intractable question than it may seem. Because peace to all saucerheads, but they very, very definitely are NOT here. 

More on possibility that Omicron is more transmissible but less virulent

Still very preliminary, and too early for any firm conclusions, but here is at least a hint of how it might be that Omicron, while more transmissible and at least somewhat more vaccine resistant, may actually cause less severe illness than previous variants. As I've noted before, even if this turns out not to be the case with Omicron, this kind of mutation to less virulence is actually how viral epidemics tend to end naturally, so it will not be surprising, now or later, if this happens with COVID. 

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/covid-notes-1 

Read David Wallace Wells on the Omicron Wave(s)

I repeat my several times stated opinion that spending the cost of just one or two F-35s to vaccinate the entire world would be the most cost effective and worthwhile investment our government could make right now. Yes, I know that would not directly impact the Omicron wave(s) that much, but it would do more than anything else to help put COVID 19 in the rear view mirror. 

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/12/can-anything-stop-the-omicron-wave.html 

Re: Pandemic trumps economy apparently

I think he should write and publish a book. I'd buy it.

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:09 PM Martin Ballard <martin.booe@gmail.com> wrote:

I would like to motion that David found a discord room or thread or whatever. https://discord.com/ 

I actually want to know his take on a turn of events before anybody else. 

Having said that, maybe I should investigate what's involved. 

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:19 PM F Johnson <fhoozit@gmail.com> wrote:

David,

This is so on target!  Don't waste it!  

By that I mean, send this and some of your other thoughts (always well written, I might add) to high-profile people in the Dem. Party -- e.g., your Representative, your Senators, the chair of your State Democratic Party, the chair of the DNC, others who have some clout in the party -- and in letters to the editor, and the like.  Maybe you already do all that.  If so, bravo, kudos, keep it up!  If not, start to do it.  Just maybe someone with vision will see it and it will spark something in what I have to call our creaky old Party.  (That's a paraphrase of something Archbishop Tutu once said.)

The Democratic Party's biggest failing is that it doesn't know how to illuminate and sell the facts in a way that publicizes the truth and drives it home with the voters.  The Republicans are better at selling lies than we are at selling the truth!  If we take a look at the preceding sentence, we have to ask ourselves, who has the better product??!!

I know that similar thoughts are being expressed in all kinds of editorials and commentary in progressive newspapers and media, certainly in the ones I read or access.  But the Party still isn't getting it.  It can't hurt for them to hear it from multiple sources.

Anyway, thanks for this and keep up the good work.

Fred

(The Rev. Fred H. Johnson, Jr.)

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:55 PM JEAN SMTH <jean316@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Agree! We can't let the former guy weasel his way back into our White House

~ Jean Clare Smith, MD, MPH

Decatur, GA

On Dec 10, 2021, at 9:40 AM, David Studhalter (ds@gyromantic.com) <oldionus@gmail.com> wrote:



If you think the psychology of the continuing pandemic isn't having a devastating political effect, then how can you account for the fact that the first three quarters had a real GDP growth rate of 7.8%, higher than in decades, in other words an economy roaring back.... but the Democrats are unable to make that seem like good news and turn any credit electorally from the economic policy changes they passed? Which are obviously working? Usually when record numbers of people feel secure enough to quit jobs, knowing it's easy to get another job, that's called "boom times" and everyone is fat and happy. 

Of course, the pandemic policies of the Biden administration have been vastly superior to those of the former guy as well, but the real truth is that presidents and even governments can't actually control pandemics. There are points to criticize, but much of what has happened since Biden took office in this sphere is beyond anyone's control. 

Sure supply chain problems persist for certain imported goods, but the reality is that just about anyone who wants to work can get a job, most commodities, in particular food, are readily available and, despite inflation, people are buying what they want. Yet most people when asked think the economy is bad and blame Biden. 

Democrats had better figure out how to turn around the messaging on all this or we're in for a world of hurt come the midterms. 

--

Fred Hoyer Johnson Jr

--

Martin Booe

Bias in the grey lady? Could it be?

OK, so call me biased, which is what I accuse the New York Times of. Why, I ask, is it necessary to run yet another multipart piece on the end of the Afghanistan war, replete with innate distortion coming from overemphasis on what in the end was a reasonably orderly ending, something that is never orderly? If not, in some misguided interest in "balance," to show the Biden administration in a bad light? This while the other party really is in the midst of a full scale slow-motion coup, which should be screamed from the headlines every day? 00

Re: Pandemic trumps economy apparently

I would like to motion that David found a discord room or thread or whatever. https://discord.com/ 

I actually want to know his take on a turn of events before anybody else. 

Having said that, maybe I should investigate what's involved. 

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:19 PM F Johnson <fhoozit@gmail.com> wrote:

David,

This is so on target!  Don't waste it!  

By that I mean, send this and some of your other thoughts (always well written, I might add) to high-profile people in the Dem. Party -- e.g., your Representative, your Senators, the chair of your State Democratic Party, the chair of the DNC, others who have some clout in the party -- and in letters to the editor, and the like.  Maybe you already do all that.  If so, bravo, kudos, keep it up!  If not, start to do it.  Just maybe someone with vision will see it and it will spark something in what I have to call our creaky old Party.  (That's a paraphrase of something Archbishop Tutu once said.)

The Democratic Party's biggest failing is that it doesn't know how to illuminate and sell the facts in a way that publicizes the truth and drives it home with the voters.  The Republicans are better at selling lies than we are at selling the truth!  If we take a look at the preceding sentence, we have to ask ourselves, who has the better product??!!

I know that similar thoughts are being expressed in all kinds of editorials and commentary in progressive newspapers and media, certainly in the ones I read or access.  But the Party still isn't getting it.  It can't hurt for them to hear it from multiple sources.

Anyway, thanks for this and keep up the good work.

Fred

(The Rev. Fred H. Johnson, Jr.)

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:55 PM JEAN SMTH <jean316@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Agree! We can't let the former guy weasel his way back into our White House

~ Jean Clare Smith, MD, MPH

Decatur, GA

On Dec 10, 2021, at 9:40 AM, David Studhalter (ds@gyromantic.com) <oldionus@gmail.com> wrote:



If you think the psychology of the continuing pandemic isn't having a devastating political effect, then how can you account for the fact that the first three quarters had a real GDP growth rate of 7.8%, higher than in decades, in other words an economy roaring back.... but the Democrats are unable to make that seem like good news and turn any credit electorally from the economic policy changes they passed? Which are obviously working? Usually when record numbers of people feel secure enough to quit jobs, knowing it's easy to get another job, that's called "boom times" and everyone is fat and happy. 

Of course, the pandemic policies of the Biden administration have been vastly superior to those of the former guy as well, but the real truth is that presidents and even governments can't actually control pandemics. There are points to criticize, but much of what has happened since Biden took office in this sphere is beyond anyone's control. 

Sure supply chain problems persist for certain imported goods, but the reality is that just about anyone who wants to work can get a job, most commodities, in particular food, are readily available and, despite inflation, people are buying what they want. Yet most people when asked think the economy is bad and blame Biden. 

Democrats had better figure out how to turn around the messaging on all this or we're in for a world of hurt come the midterms. 

--

Fred Hoyer Johnson Jr

--

Martin Booe

Re: Pandemic trumps economy apparently

David,

This is so on target!  Don't waste it!  

By that I mean, send this and some of your other thoughts (always well written, I might add) to high-profile people in the Dem. Party -- e.g., your Representative, your Senators, the chair of your State Democratic Party, the chair of the DNC, others who have some clout in the party -- and in letters to the editor, and the like.  Maybe you already do all that.  If so, bravo, kudos, keep it up!  If not, start to do it.  Just maybe someone with vision will see it and it will spark something in what I have to call our creaky old Party.  (That's a paraphrase of something Archbishop Tutu once said.)

The Democratic Party's biggest failing is that it doesn't know how to illuminate and sell the facts in a way that publicizes the truth and drives it home with the voters.  The Republicans are better at selling lies than we are at selling the truth!  If we take a look at the preceding sentence, we have to ask ourselves, who has the better product??!!

I know that similar thoughts are being expressed in all kinds of editorials and commentary in progressive newspapers and media, certainly in the ones I read or access.  But the Party still isn't getting it.  It can't hurt for them to hear it from multiple sources.

Anyway, thanks for this and keep up the good work.

Fred

(The Rev. Fred H. Johnson, Jr.)

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:55 PM JEAN SMTH <jean316@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Agree! We can't let the former guy weasel his way back into our White House

~ Jean Clare Smith, MD, MPH

Decatur, GA

On Dec 10, 2021, at 9:40 AM, David Studhalter (ds@gyromantic.com) <oldionus@gmail.com> wrote:



If you think the psychology of the continuing pandemic isn't having a devastating political effect, then how can you account for the fact that the first three quarters had a real GDP growth rate of 7.8%, higher than in decades, in other words an economy roaring back.... but the Democrats are unable to make that seem like good news and turn any credit electorally from the economic policy changes they passed? Which are obviously working? Usually when record numbers of people feel secure enough to quit jobs, knowing it's easy to get another job, that's called "boom times" and everyone is fat and happy. 

Of course, the pandemic policies of the Biden administration have been vastly superior to those of the former guy as well, but the real truth is that presidents and even governments can't actually control pandemics. There are points to criticize, but much of what has happened since Biden took office in this sphere is beyond anyone's control. 

Sure supply chain problems persist for certain imported goods, but the reality is that just about anyone who wants to work can get a job, most commodities, in particular food, are readily available and, despite inflation, people are buying what they want. Yet most people when asked think the economy is bad and blame Biden. 

Democrats had better figure out how to turn around the messaging on all this or we're in for a world of hurt come the midterms. 

--

Fred Hoyer Johnson Jr

Re: Pandemic trumps economy apparently

Agree! We can't let the former guy weasel his way back into our White House

~ Jean Clare Smith, MD, MPH

Decatur, GA

On Dec 10, 2021, at 9:40 AM, David Studhalter (ds@gyromantic.com) <oldionus@gmail.com> wrote:



If you think the psychology of the continuing pandemic isn't having a devastating political effect, then how can you account for the fact that the first three quarters had a real GDP growth rate of 7.8%, higher than in decades, in other words an economy roaring back.... but the Democrats are unable to make that seem like good news and turn any credit electorally from the economic policy changes they passed? Which are obviously working? Usually when record numbers of people feel secure enough to quit jobs, knowing it's easy to get another job, that's called "boom times" and everyone is fat and happy. 

Of course, the pandemic policies of the Biden administration have been vastly superior to those of the former guy as well, but the real truth is that presidents and even governments can't actually control pandemics. There are points to criticize, but much of what has happened since Biden took office in this sphere is beyond anyone's control. 

Sure supply chain problems persist for certain imported goods, but the reality is that just about anyone who wants to work can get a job, most commodities, in particular food, are readily available and, despite inflation, people are buying what they want. Yet most people when asked think the economy is bad and blame Biden. 

Democrats had better figure out how to turn around the messaging on all this or we're in for a world of hurt come the midterms. 

Pandemic trumps economy apparently

If you think the psychology of the continuing pandemic isn't having a devastating political effect, then how can you account for the fact that the first three quarters had a real GDP growth rate of 7.8%, higher than in decades, in other words an economy roaring back.... but the Democrats are unable to make that seem like good news and turn any credit electorally from the economic policy changes they passed? Which are obviously working? Usually when record numbers of people feel secure enough to quit jobs, knowing it's easy to get another job, that's called "boom times" and everyone is fat and happy. 

Of course, the pandemic policies of the Biden administration have been vastly superior to those of the former guy as well, but the real truth is that presidents and even governments can't actually control pandemics. There are points to criticize, but much of what has happened since Biden took office in this sphere is beyond anyone's control. 

Sure supply chain problems persist for certain imported goods, but the reality is that just about anyone who wants to work can get a job, most commodities, in particular food, are readily available and, despite inflation, people are buying what they want. Yet most people when asked think the economy is bad and blame Biden. 

Democrats had better figure out how to turn around the messaging on all this or we're in for a world of hurt come the midterms. 

Pearl Harbor 80th anniversary

Surprised at myself that I let the 80th anniversary of Pearl Harbor go unremarked. I remember the 25th anniversary, my Japanese American gym teacher conscripted to serve as health teacher announced a pop quiz with the quip that "The Japanese strike every 25 years." Wasn't funny then, or now; but then, neither was the fact that he and his parents had been interned at Manzanar in the Owens Valley, east of the Sierra Nevada during the war that followed Pearl Harbor. A fact which I didn't know or appreciate at the time. Humans have a remarkable ability to act inhumanely towards one another, for justifications that in the end vanish like the ill winds they were. 

More thoughts on omicron and the possible future of COVID

Still too early to draw any conclusions or make plans based on these reports, but here is another report indicating that clinicians on the ground are finding the Omicron variant more contagious but less severe. "Contagious" may include vaccine resistant, but that's not as clear. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/06/world/africa/omicron-coronavirus-research-spread.html 

One thing that may not be particularly intuitive is that, generally, extreme pathogenic virulence confers no selective advantage on a virus or other pathogen. A less deadly form of the same organism may, in fact usually does, survive better, because killing your hosts is not usually a recipe for long term genotype survival. So it may well happen, as has often happened in the past, that a form that is more transmissible, and more immune resistant, but substantially less virulent, may come to dominate, with the long term effect that the pandemic recedes into the realm of troublesome but not particularly lethal or economically devastating illnesses such as colds and (mostly) flu. Sure, flu kills a lot of people every year, but we've adapted to thinking of that as background, for better or worse. If COVID were to evolve into a state where nearly everyone got it one or more times in their life but only one in 100,000 died from it, again, for better or worse, we would just live with that and get on with other concerns. 

Omicron news

Way too soon for conclusions, but reports are there are early signs Omicron might even cause milder illness than Delta or the original Wuhan virus. It is possible, perhaps not likely, but possible, that this is actually a step towards the end of the pandemic.... what probably happened with the Russian Flu coronavirus in the late 19th century was that it mutated. Not into a less transmissible form, but into a cold virus, from a lethal respiratory pandemic agent. Omicron is probably not that, but it's possible. Someday they may refer to "the various coronaviruses that cause the common cold, including the mutated form of COVID-19."

Fascinating video on the evolution of the Eukarya / Nick Lane (Univ. College, London)

If you have even a little interest in evolutionary biology, I highly recommend this video. I'm reading his 2015 book, The Vital Question. 

https://youtu.be/gLcWfecmZhE?list=TLPQMDQxMjIwMjEI7hslYNgkgQ

Holy crap

Let me just say this real simple-like. As a nation, we barely squeaked by the last election with our republic intact despite a truly decisive popular-vote victory nationally in the presidency, House and Senate. And the insurrectionist forces that seek to undermine our constitutional democracy have not let up. We now have well organized institutionalized pro-insurrectionist media propaganda 24-7, states which have so gerrymandered the House seats that a right wing victory is highly likely in 2022, a Senate which is so distorted from any kind of democratic norm structurally that it's likely 30-35% of the voters will take a majority of the Senate, either next year or in '24. And the Senate cannot function without a supermajority anyway thanks to probably the worst institutional structural distortion among any major counties' elected legislatures. States controlled by the insurrectionist faction and right wing judges have ensured that massive and effective voter suppression will occur, and that laws making it extremely difficult for Democratic voters to vote are enacted and kept in force. Meanwhile, the Democratic party seems unable to organize any effective counter to these developments, and the mainstream press, so obsessed with fictitious "balance," focuses almost entirely on negative stories that make the right wing insurrectionists seem normal and the only political party that is seeking to maintain the republic seem weak and ineffective. 

Face it folks, at least since 1860, there has never been a greater threat to our republic, either internal or external, and we are failing to rise to the challenge. 

Omicron blues

No cause for panic, but we have to look at facts. And the facts about the Omicron variant aren't pretty so far. The worst part is that for the cost of a half dozen fighter jets we, just us Americans, could probably have vaccinated enough people by now in the global south to have prevented this mutation set from emerging at all. 

https://twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1466480113487392769 

https://twitter.com/TWenseleers/status/1466501989500653568

https://www.ft.com/content/df3738ab-ea2b-438c-96ed-aa7eb75451a2