There's an article in
Scientific American about how "bionic" systems are going to be better
than plants at producing biofuels and other useful molecules using the
energy of sunlight. I think this is a milestone, and extremely
interesting. It's inevitable, I would argue, that as human understanding
of chemistry and energetics increases, the time must come when
artificial systems outperform natural ones at the particular purpose for
which they are designed (since, after all, evolution results in
adaptation to natural environments, not particular human purposes).
There is no reason at all to be resistant to this kind of technology. In
the future, the extent to which we are able to consciously and
deliberately minimize our adverse impact on the Earth's natural
environments will be precisely the extent to which those environments
are able to continue to exist.
Human "interference" with nature cannot be avoided. If one group of people altruistically control their behavior in this regard, another will not. The only option is to understand nature fully, serve human purposes in such a way as to avoid destruction of natural environments, and thereby create positive synergy. The alternative is the opposite: downward spiral and extinction.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Gyromantic Informicon. Comments are not moderated. If you encounter a problem, please go to home page and follow directions to send me an e-mail.