Paul Davies and Seth Shostak, two SETI pundits who have
rather divergent views on several of the relevant issues, both believe that
advanced alien civilizations, if and when we discover evidence of their
existence, are likely to be “post-biological,” i.e., some form of advanced
computers.
While I give both of these gentlemen considerable credit for
imaginativeness and for considering carefully the implications of a lot of the
assumptions that are usually made about the likelihood of alien life and
intelligence, here is an area where I think they are both making unfounded
assumptions.
The fact is that there is no evidence, at all, that
artificial computers have any awareness or consciousness. I question whether
evolution or intentional development can or will occur among “artificial minds,”
when there is no indication that their functioning is anything more than rapid
and complex calculation, lacking any sort of subjective experiential nature.
I suppose it’s conceivable that artificial machines could
reproduce themselves and mutate and evolve through natural selection, this isn’t
something we’ve ever seen, so I would like to see some evidence that it’s
likely to happen before we start assuming that it will happen. And, along the
lines of the Fermi Paradox as reasons for concluding that intelligent life is
probably not all that common in the universe, I think the lack of intelligent
machines swarming all over and cluttering the place up (which they would if
they were common and had existed for an arbitrarily long time, given the immense
age of the universe and the fact that it has existed pretty much as it is now
for a significant fraction of that time), is pretty strong evidence that such
machine civilizations are not common in the universe either.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Gyromantic Informicon. Comments are not moderated. If you encounter a problem, please go to home page and follow directions to send me an e-mail.