I think it no exaggeration to argue that this coming
presidential election may be one of, if not the most important of my lifetime.
My main reason for this belief is the Supreme Court. It is hardly an original
idea — that, from a Progressive point of view (the actual issues-determined
view of the majority of Americans), the danger of a Supreme Court irreversibly
dominated by an un-American Rightist philosophy is the greatest threat to the
American Republic of our lifetime. Yet it is quite clearly true. Our present
court has four justices, the Gang of Four, whose identities are known to every
thinking American, who do not believe in the essential constitutional
principles of our country, and who fail completely to respect principles of
law, instead deciding critical issues on the basis of right-wing ideology
alone. If you doubt this, please peruse the so-called reasoning of the Citizens United case (I have done so).
It’s unmistakable.
From this corporate personhood, plutocracy is good, money is
speech judicial fiat, to the potential for grave damage on civil liberties (such
as the recent defense authorization bill that purports to effectively
eviscerate the 1st, 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments), to reproductive rights, to
the right to be free from religion and to choose your own partners with equal
treatment under law, to the right to fair elections… the list is long and
frightening. If a Romney or other Rightist becomes president, the court will
almost certainly be cemented in
Rightist ideology for a long time to come.
I have been quite critical of President Obama on a number of
issues of importance to me, as I have discussed on this blog at length. I regard
Obama as no better than a corporatist-Centrist Democrat, whose policy
intentions are well aligned with the moneyed interests that really run this
country. But Democrats are different
from Republicans. They at least believe in checks and balances, and in a system
that is not entirely given over to
exclusive interests of the rich and powerful. President Obama is no Progressive,
but on a whole host of issues, his policy intent is clearly superior to that of
any conceivable Republican opponent.
And for those reasons, I intend to support his re-election,
both financially and with time and energy. Our political system is deeply
dysfunctional, and one of its dysfunctions is its bipolarity; but this is
simply a fact of life. We should work, long term, to change that, but we must also make the right choices for the future now, in the short term. We must, as thinking people, act in ways that we
sincerely believe will result in the best outcome for the future. For me, the
choice is clear, that we have to put our support on the side closer to our
world view, while continuing to put what pressure we can on those whom we
support to change their views to
conform more closely to ours, while constructing in our advocacy the means to a better system, and working for that for the longer term.
But the most salient point
in this short-term calculus, for me, is the danger of generation-long domination of the
Supreme Court by truly dangerous Rightist ideologues. We’re almost there
already; if we don’t reverse the trend, our country will be benighted by
Rightist jurisprudence for so long that real social progress will be hobbled no matter what changes in the Zeitgeist may bring in terms of
electoral politics in the coming years. And this, alone, for me, is sufficient reason to eschew any thought of
Progressive Third Party candidates, or of high-mindedly foregoing voting
altogether (which I’ve seen advocated), and getting serious about making sure
that the most Progressive Democrats we can find run to defeat Republicans, that
Democrats in general are elected and re-elected to the House and Senate, and, above all,
that President Obama is re-elected this year.
If you care to look at my.firedoglake.com at the commments to this same post, you will see that the majority of FDL progressives are so disillusioned with this president that they have no intention of voting for him. I admit, I do adhere to the expediency argument. I just don't see that we have a choice, because we will not get something better if we fail to vote for Obama and Democrats for Congroess.
ReplyDelete