Abdul!

Can't help but notice the similarity in accent and cadence between Abdul al-Sayed and Barack Obama. I don't know if it's conscious, but he's very effective in speeches. 

 

______________________________

MUSICA SUMMUM DOLOREM TRANSFIGURAT 

ET SUMMUM GAUDIUM SALTAT

______________________________

Q&A with Claude about the origin of Italy (geologically)

Of conceivable interest~~  [My experience is that Claude is pretty good with this kind of thing]:

Q: Is it true that Italy is a piece of Africa that rifted off, crossed the Tethys Seaway, and collided with Europe forming the Alps somewhat analogously to the collision of India that formed the Himalayas, or was it an igneous province or other unit?

Claude's Answer: 

Your instinct is more right than wrong, and the corrections are the interesting part.

Not an igneous province — that one's clean. Adria is ordinary continental crust: Variscan basement under a very thick Mesozoic carbonate platform. The Dolomites and the Apulian limestones are that platform. It's a drowned tropical shelf, not a LIP.

There was a continent, and it did rift from Africa. The current framework, from van Hinsbergen and colleagues (Gondwana Research, 2019), calls it Greater Adria. It separated from Gondwana around 240 Ma, was roughly Greenland-sized, and by ~140 Ma sat mostly underwater as a vast carbonate platform. It drifted north and began colliding with Europe somewhere around 100–120 Ma.

But here's where the India analogy breaks, and it breaks at the most important point. India was thick, buoyant, cratonic crust. It could not subduct, so when it arrived it crumpled Asia and raised the Himalaya while surviving intact as a continent. Greater Adria was mostly thin, stretched, sediment-draped crust — and it went down. The bulk of it was dragged into the mantle, where tomography still images it around 1,500 km deep beneath southern Europe. The Alps, Apennines, Dinarides, and Hellenides are essentially the scrapings: sedimentary cover peeled off the top of a descending slab and stacked against the margin. Same journey, opposite fate. India built a mountain range by refusing to sink; Greater Adria built several by sinking and leaving its skin behind.

"Crossed the Tethys" also overstates the separation. The debate over whether Adria is an African promontory or an independent microplate is genuinely unresolved and depends on which evidence you weight. Paleomagnetism, Sn wave propagation through the Ionian mantle lid, and paleoclimatic data all point to Adria having moved and rotated with Africa since the Jurassic. Geodesy and seismicity say it behaves as a distinct microplate today within the Africa–Eurasia boundary zone. The independent rotation that has been measured is modest — something like 9.5° ± 8.7° counterclockwise for Apulia since the Eocene. So it wasn't a long solo voyage like India's 6,000 km sprint. The ocean that actually closed to make the Alps was the Piemont-Liguria basin (Alpine Tethys), a relatively narrow strand opened around 170–160 Ma as a byproduct of Central Atlantic rifting.

The subduction polarity is also reversed. In the Himalaya, India is both the indenter and the lower plate. In the Alps, Europe subducted beneath Adria — Adria is the indenter and the upper plate. That's why the Alps are doubly vergent, with the Southern Alps forming a south-directed retro-wedge on the Adriatic side.

And Italy is not one thing. This is the part most summaries flatten:

• Apulia, the Gargano, the Adriatic, the Po Plain, the Southern Alps — Adria proper, Gondwanan affinity. The African piece.
• The Apennines — not a block at all, but a young accretionary fold-thrust belt assembled by eastward rollback of the Adriatic slab.
• Sardinia and Corsica — pieces of Europe. They were attached to southern France and rotated counterclockwise roughly 45° as the Liguro-Provençal basin opened, mostly between about 21 and 15 Ma.
• Calabria and northeastern Sicily — European-affinity crystalline basement, rafted southeast by rollback of the Ionian slab.
• Western Sicily — Maghrebian, African affinity.

So the honest version: the heel and spine of the boot are African, the western islands are detached France, Calabria is a wandering shard of Europe that ended up on the wrong side, and the Apennines are the wreckage of a continent that mostly isn't there anymore.

Sources: van Hinsbergen et al. 2019 — Science news coverage · National Geographic on Greater Adria · Adria microplate: a puzzling key stone in west-central Mediterranean geodynamics · Did Adria rotate relative to Africa? · Le Breton et al. — Post-20 Ma motion of the Adriatic plate

 

______________________________

MUSICA SUMMUM DOLOREM TRANSFIGURAT 

ET SUMMUM GAUDIUM SALTAT

______________________________

Historoy of Garlic

I always thoutht the iconic L.A. garlic restaurant (yes, for real)... The Stinking Rose... was misnamed, since garlic is a lily, not a rose. (I believe it's no longer there). I have long thought that both garlic and onions, along with indoor plumbing, are true hallmarks of genuine civilization. Sine qua non, even.

https://youtu.be/TxaR_U68dM4?list=TLPQMDgwODIwMjaE8q9OWnXpVg

 

______________________________

MUSICA SUMMUM DOLOREM TRANSFIGURAT 

ET SUMMUM GAUDIUM SALTAT

______________________________

asking ai about actual science

I have a modest late in life interest in geology, and I found myself intrigued by the differences between the Cascades and the older Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mts, All formed by complex processes but both involving, at different times, subduction zones causing magma to rise to, and/or near, the surface. So I asked Claude about it, and it gave back some really interesting information which puts a perspective on this I didn't really understand. Here's part of it: 

Time. The Sierra Nevada batholith is not one intrusion. It's hundreds of individual plutons amalgamated over ~150 Myr, then unroofed. The modern Cascade arc has had ~35–40 Myr. Run the Cascades another hundred million years, strip 10 km off the top, and you'd be looking at a batholith. Batholiths are what arc plutonism looks like integrated over deep time.

 

Flux. But time alone doesn't do it, because the Sierra had a genuine flare-up. The ~120–80 Ma pulse produced far more magma than steady-state arc behavior predicts — the modern analog people reach for is the Altiplano-Puna in the central Andes, not the Cascades. Arcs are episodic: long lulls punctuated by short high-flux events, probably driven by arc migration into fertile lithosphere or by underthrusting/relamination of crustal material into the melt zone. The Cascades right now are a low-flux arc — young warm slab, slow convergence, modest crustal thickness.

 

Crust. Sierran magmas ponded in and assimilated thick continental lithosphere, which is why they're granodiorite-dominated with heavy evolved isotopic signatures. Cascade magmas rise through thinner, younger, partly oceanic accreted crust and come out more mafic. Basalt–andesite–dacite versus tonalite–granodiorite–granite.

 

The Klamaths are a third case. Those are Jurassic–Cretaceous plutons intruding a stack of accreted oceanic terranes — ophiolites and island arcs. They're smaller, more mafic (lots of tonalite and trondhjemite, some gabbro), and scattered rather than amalgamated. Calling it a batholith oversells the coherence; it's a swarm of plutons stitching terranes together, because there was no thick continental root to build one in.

 

Which loops back: Pilchuck is closer in spirit to nothing on that list. It's a crustal melt of an accretionary wedge during a slab-window thermal anomaly — an arc-adjacent accident, not an arc product.

Sources: Northwest Geology Field Trips — Mount Pilchuck trail guide · Dragovich et al., 2017, GSA Abstracts · Tabor et al., 2002, USGS Sauk River quad · Mineral geochemistry of the Granite Falls stock, Bald Mountain pluton, and Mount Pilchuck stock · Fingerprinting episodic arc activity in the Sierra Nevada batholith, GSA Bulletin

______________________

(My question had included a request to explain why Washington's Mt. Pilchuk was different in composition from other granitic mountains in the Cascades.)

As an aside, this arose because I was experimenting with Anthropic's Claude vs. ChatGPT. I must say its answers, esp. with the more intensive "thinking" turned on, are much more cohesive and more likely to challenge any preconceived notions implicit in your questions than the OpenAI product. I believe I have uncovered a real use for LLMs that may not be particularly profitable but is quite useful: self-directed continuing education. They don't actually "know" anything, but they can look stuff up lickety split, organize it, and answer your questions. This is a genuine value in my opinion. 

MUSICA SUMMUM DOLOREM TRANSFIGURAT 

ET SUMMUM GAUDIUM SALTAT

______________________________